Will Drugs Do The Republicans In Next Year? Or Can They Finally Stop Trump On Something Existential?
- Howie Klein
- Apr 9
- 4 min read

On Tuesday evening, at an NRCC fundraising gala, Trump committed the GOP to political suicide. He said “We are going to be announcing very shortly a major tariff on pharmaceuticals. Once we do that, they’re going to come rushing back into our country, because we’re the big market. The advantage we have over everybody is that we’re the big market.” So... not at a policy roundtable or economic forum—but at a public event surrounded by House Republicans, the very people whose political futures depend on seniors in swing districts. They smiled and nodded while Trump promised to jack up prescription drug prices in the name of economic nationalism. They should have booed him off the stage. But they didn’t. They clapped. They posed for photos. They let it slide. That moment is going to come back to haunt dozens of them.
If Trump goes ahead with these broad tariffs on pharmaceuticals he’s threatening, the short-term damage to seniors— and anyone relying on prescription medications—will be significant. Tariffs = higher costs for imported drugs and over 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients used in U.S. medications come from abroad (especially India and China), even if final drugs are assembled domestically, costs will go up. Seniors on fixed incomes and Medicare will be hit hardest— especially those with chronic conditions who need multiple daily medications— almost all of them.
If the tariffs are abrupt and major drugmakers don’t adjust quickly, there could be catastrophic shortages and delays in delivery. Generic drugs, which seniors disproportionately rely on, are particularly vulnerable because they’re often low-margin imports. Get ready for insurers to rise premiums in anticipation of higher drug costs. Part D out-of-pocket costs will become prohibitively expensive for lower-income seniors. And while Biden's Inflation Reduction Act capped insulin costs and phased out the catastrophic coverage gap, many essential drugs remain expensive and vulnerable to new price spikes from tariffs. The GOP’s silence on Trump’s plan all but guarantees that any progress Democrats have made on reducing prescription drug costs could be wiped out— just in time for the 2026 midterms.
Let’s keep in mind that seniors unable to afford or access their meds often skip doses or don’t fill prescriptions at all leading to higher hospitalization rates, worsening conditions, and more strain on Medicare— ironically making healthcare even more expensive.
Medical inflation has been relatively modest compared to food and housing. Tariffs on drugs will tip the scale. Trump’s rhetoric about “bringing back” domestic production is a long-term goal— but seniors don’t have— literally in many cases— five to ten years to wait for factories to be built. Seniors are the most reliable voter demographic, especially in key swing states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan, not to mention Maine and West Virginia. Higher out-of-pocket costs would alienate voters who were otherwise open to— or even enthusiastic about— Trump’s MAGA rhetoric.
It’ll be up to Democrats to make sure Trump’s victims understand that this is another salvo in his ongoing war on global supply chains and that this is another Trumpian move rubber stamped by congressional Republicans: bold, confrontational, and economically reckless. Democratic strategists know that seniors, who already spend a disproportionate share of their income on prescriptions, will feel it first and worst. Democrats will have to make sure they understand why and make this a political landmine for the GOP, especially in swing districts with older voters. With seniors voting in higher numbers than any other age group in midterms, this alone has got to end the careers of David Schweikert and Juan Ciscomani in Arizona, Maria Salazar, Aaron Bean, Anna Paulina Lunda, Laurel Lee and Cory Mills in Florida, Zach Nunn, Mariannette Miller-Meeks and Ashley Hinson in Iowa, Bill Huizenga and Tom Barrett in Michigan, Brian Fitzpatrick, Ryan Mackenzie, Scott Perry and Ron Bresnahan in Pennsylvania, Bryan Steil and Derrick Van Orden in Wisconsin, Nick LaLota and Mike Lawler in New York, Tom Kean and Jeff Van Drew in New Jersey, maybe even Tom Edwards (NC), Ann Wagner (MO) and Mike Turner (OH). Democrats have a clean, easy line of attack: “Republicans raised your drug prices to please Big Pharma and Donald Trump.”
The word “tariff” may sound distant and even abstract to some, but the moment prices rise at the pharmacy counter, the pain will become very personal and very present and even if Trump walks back the scheme before the 2026 midterms, the damage will linger—both financially and politically. Health-related issues tend to stick in voters’ minds longer than abstract economic metrics or culture-war messaging.
Trump is once again betting that populist optics can distract from material harm. But tariffs on pharmaceuticals don’t just hurt “globalists” or “woke CEOs”— they hurt grandmothers with high blood pressure, cancer survivors on maintenance meds, and retirees trying to stay healthy enough to care for their grandchildren. If Republicans enable this policy, they will find themselves losing the very voters they’ve relied on for decades.

So I just read he’s backed down on some tariffs. We are on a freaking seesaw. Everything now depends on the whims and gut feelings of the mad king, from one day to the next. Predictability and stability are shot to hell. Sheer lunacy. We are living in a lunatic asylum.