Yesterday, we saw that House Democrats passed a very popular assault weapons ban that only 2 Republicans could bring themselves to vote for— and now Senate Republicans will use a filibuster to kill it— along with more American children. That’s only the most recent popular legislation House Democrats passed without Republican support, only to see it shit-canned by McConnell and the Senate extremists.
On July 21, only 8 Republicans voted for the Right to Contraception Act. On July 19, only 47 Republicans voted for the Respect for Marriage Act. On July 15, only 3 Republicans voted for the Ensuring Access To Abortion Act. On the same day, only not even one Republican voted for the Women’s Health Protection Act. On July 13, only 43 Republicans voted for the Active Shooter Alert Act. On June 23, just 2 Republicans voted for the LGBTQI+ Data Inclusion Act. On June 8, just 5 Republicans voted for the Protecting Our Kids Act. On May 19, no Republicans voted for the Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act. The day before that just 1 Republican had voted for the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act and just 12 had voted for the Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act. I think you get the picture, right? But is it adding up to anything? Not in beet red Trumpist districts, that's for sure, but...
Yesterday, Hannah Knowles, writing for the Washington Post, reported that some Republicans fear it is. There are swing voters who see the GOP as too extreme now. She wrote that “Republicans in Congress this month blocked a bill protecting the ability to cross state lines for an abortion, despite strong public support for such a measure. The Texas attorney general said he would be willing to defend the state’s defunct anti-sodomy law, while a GOP Senate candidate in Arizona has called for a nationwide abortion ban— two positions also out of step with public opinion. And some of the party’s most vocal members traffic in extreme and inflammatory rhetoric— from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Q-GA) claiming that heterosexual people will disappear while denouncing ‘trans terrorist’ educators, to Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) calling abortion rights protesters ugly: ‘Nobody wants to impregnate you if you look like a thumb.’”
Uncompromising positions and loaded rhetoric on key social issues are escalating concerns within GOP circles that the party is moving too far out of sync with popular opinion, projecting new hostility to gay people and potentially alienating women voters in high-stakes races. The Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade and ending a nationwide right to abortion last month has spawned strict new bans and stirred fears that gay rights and access to contraception could be next— shifting the focus from other culture-war battles where Republicans felt they had a winning message.
“I feel we’re on this sort of seesaw where one party sort of gets the upper hand on social-cultural issues, then they overplay that hand,” said Christine Matthews, a moderate Virginia Republican and longtime strategist for GOP candidates. “Republicans have taken things too far.”
She warned of fueling Democratic arguments that Republicans “want to take our country back to the 1950s” and said she swore out loud after reading one antiabortion advocate’s comments that a 10-year-old rape victim, under model legislation, would have to give birth.
…Even in tight swing-state races, some candidates have embraced sweeping abortion restrictions. The leading GOP candidate for Senate in Arizona, Blake Masters, has called for a federal “personhood” law banning abortion nationwide. Asked about Georgia’s ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, Republican Georgia Senate nominee Herschel Walker said this spring that he generally opposes exceptions.
In Wisconsin, Democrats have hammered Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) for his statements on abortion, including his comment that the end of Roe "might be a little messy for some people.” He recently put out a lengthy statement saying he supports exceptions for rape and incest and free contraception for those cannot afford it; this month he also said he has “no reason to oppose” a federal bill protecting same-sex marriage rights now under consideration in the Senate.
“The vast majority of America … are not where the extreme sides are,” said Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who has the endorsement of major antiabortion groups and criticizes the stance of both Republicans and Democrats. “They want guardrails, and they want to be reasonable about it and particularly compassionate to women who’ve been wronged.”
Mace was among a handful of Republicans to vote for a federal bill guaranteeing access to birth control and walked around the U.S. Capitol last week with a message taped to the back of her blazer: “My state is banning exceptions— PROTECT CONTRACEPTION.” She has been advocating for exceptions in cases of rape and incest and says she dropped out of high school after being sexually assaulted.
“I went to a couple events this weekend and every 60 seconds, every one to two minutes, somebody was coming up to me, mostly women, and all they said was thank you,” Mace said in an interview this week.
Republicans have cited a range of reasons for opposing the contraceptives bill, which was blocked in the Senate on Wednesday, saying it would make religious groups violate their beliefs and also allow the use of abortion-inducing drugs.
A federal bill to prevent states from banning travel for abortion also met Republican opposition in the Senate this month, underscoring a contrast with public opinion. About 8 in 10 Americans— including 64 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of independents— say states that ban abortion should not be allowed to outlaw travel for the procedure, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll conducted a month after the Supreme Court struck down Roe.
Even among GOP strategists who warn about alienating women, there is uncertainty whether the issue can break through as Republicans blame Democratic leaders for inflation, crime and fears of a recession.
“Talking to, you know, these college educated suburban women— I would say that the issue with abortion is that the economy still looms very large,” said Sarah Longwell, a moderate D.C.-based Republican strategist who has been running focus groups of voters across parties.
Still, she said the end of Roe and the elevation of extreme candidates in many GOP primaries “has given Democrats the opportunity to go on offense” and press a broader case that their opponents hold views outside the mainstream. Three-quarters of politically independent women say they see the end of Roe as a major rollback of women’s rights, the Post-Schar poll shows.
“This isn’t just anti-women rhetoric,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT). “This is an anti-women agenda that is actually becoming law in a very scary and quick way.”
…Gaetz, at a Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa, referred to female abortion rights advocates as “disgusting” and “odious on the inside and out,” portraying them as overweight and too unattractive to get pregnant. He later stood by his remarks and told detractors, “Be offended.”
In interviews, many Republican strategists thought such comments were unlikely make a difference to voters already desensitized by right-wing celebrities’ embrace of offensive and personal attacks. Former president Donald Trump paved the way, some noted: When one woman accused him of sexual assault in 2016, Trump said, “Believe me, she would not be my first choice.”
“Every village has an idiot, and we have several villages,” said one prominent GOP strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to be more candid. The strategist added, “I don’t think there’s probably anything said before Oct. 15 that’s going to stick around till Election Day. And it’s got to be said by a high-enough profile [figure].”
Others saw the demeaning words as part of a long-running problem for a party that has lost crucial support from moderate women in past elections. “Comments like that do a tremendous amount of damage to the Republican brand,” said GOP consultant Lauren Zelt, who worked on Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign in 2012.
Jennifer Lim, the executive director of Republican Women for Progress— which has criticized the GOP’s transformation under Trump— agreed. She said LGBTQ rights are another social issue where Republicans are “moving in the wrong direction” without a cohesive response from the party.
…Some Republicans have warned for months that backlash against discussions of LGBTQ issues in schools could brand the party as anti-gay, as right-wing stars embrace unsubstantiated accusations that teachers who broach sexual orientation and gender identity in the classroom are “grooming” children and making them vulnerable to abuse. The concerns intensified in June as the Texas GOP added language to their party platform calling homosexuality “an abnormal lifestyle choice.”
I would be very happy to see this country go back to the progressive tax of the 1950's where the top margin al rate was IIRC 90%. But, no, the Republicans have always wanted to take us back to the Gilded Age and they have by and large already succeeded.
yes, even people as stupid as non-nazi voters in this shithole know that the democraps are a bit less evil than the nazis.
The problem is that lesser evil has never stopped the evil. never even tried.
So... is that any reason to keep voting for evil? Polling showing that idiots favor liars more because they tell the lies they want to hear? Is there no bound for americans' stupidity?
Look, if the lying hapless worthless feckless corrupt neoliberal fascist pussy democraps are TRULY our best (technically gramatically our better because we can ONLY have two...) possible... then wouldn't it be better to just get it the fuck over with rather than drag out the misery longer before the final…