Trump's Own Continuing Bumbling Is Writing The History Books

Yesterday, on top of polls showing him losing to third rate imitation of himself, Ron DeSantis and showing him more unpopular and disliked than ever, Trump announced he’ll be making a “MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT” today. Unless it’s to withdraw from the race, I doubt anyone will care. Although I guess Putin might hand Paul Whelan over to him.

Yesterday afternoon National Review editor Rich Lowry wrote that Trump’s 2024 announcement was a huge blunder. “Like almost everything else he’s done lately,” wrote Lowry, “it’s proved a flagrant political misjudgment… A move that was supposed to demonstrate his strength is showing his weakness; a move that was meant to keep other candidates out of the race is an invitation to other candidates to get in; a move that was supposed to serve notice of his continued dominance of the party is pointing toward its potential end. He’s been eclipsed as an internet troll by Elon Musk, and as a vote-getter by Ron DeSantis. He’s managed to get the worst of both worlds— he’s been largely invisible at the same time that he’s been involved in several damaging controversies. His midterms got even worse, with the final thudding defeat of one of his prized political projects, Herschel Walker in the Georgia Senate run-off.”

And Trump’s entry hasn’t boosted his poll numbers, or even stabilized them. He’s continuing to slide versus DeSantis, with a USA Today/Suffolk poll showing him trailing the Florida governor 56-33 in a hypothetical head-to-head matchup and a new Wall Street Journal poll showing DeSantis beating Trump 52-38.

In short, it’s hard to imagine how Trump could have had a worse month-long run. Ordinarily one might say, as a way of exaggerating to emphasize the point, that it only could have been worse if he had had dinner with a Nazi— but, of course, he did that, too.

It’s still early, and premature to count him out. Republicans remain scared of him, and we still can’t know if the only potential candidate to show strength against him, DeSantis, will run, or how he’d perform once in the race, especially in a potentially crowded field.

If Trump is going to win the nomination, though, it will involve recovering from his disastrous announcement and aftermath. He clearly believed that the act of announcing in and of itself would be sufficient to cement his status as top dog.

That was wrong, and it meant he never thought through the rather crucial question, “So you’re a candidate — now what are you going to do?”

There’s been no media blitz. There’s been no tour of the country. There’s been no rollout of policy or any unifying theme. It’s been Trump sitting in Mar-a-Lago, just like before, lurching from one idiotic controversy to another.

If it’s too early to make too much of the polls, Trump is still in a uniquely vulnerable place. Let’s assume that the latest surveys are in the ballpark. It’s one thing to be trailing if you are a new figure on the national stage who still has room to grow; it’s another if you have universal name ID and everyone already has an extremely well-formed view of you.

It’s going to be hard for Trump to find a second act, when his act hasn’t changed since 2015. Besides, even if he purports to have turned a new leaf, who at this point is going to believe him?

He doesn’t have easy levers to use to change the narrative. It’s not as though he can have a good legislative session next year like the governors who are thinking of running, or use his executive powers to pick useful fights.

He can’t give speeches on the Senate floor, lead legislative battles, or seek high-profile confrontations with witnesses during congressional testimony.

There probably aren’t even exciting new events he can hold to grab the attention of voters or the media. His signature, of course, are his rallies. They were fresh and new in 2015 and 2016, and quite powerful throughout his presidency and immediately afterward. Now, they are as old and familiar as a Rolling Stones concert.

What’s been most damaging to Trump is that association with him in general and “Stop the Steal” election denialism in particular proved politically toxic in the midterms.

Other Republicans can avoid that foolishness in the future. But not Trump.

He is capable of making some adjustments. He dropped the birther talk in 2016. But he’s much more personally vested in the idea that the 2020 election was stolen. It involves the emotionally fraught question of whether or not he’s truly a loser, and even if he stopped affirmatively talking about the election, he would still have to answer questions about it.

It’s possible exogenous events could help him. Perhaps an indictment could give him a shot-in-the-arm. I used to think it could deliver him the nomination. But now that more and more Republicans consider it a problem that he has so much baggage, throwing an indictment precariously on top of everything else strapped on the roof of the Trump bus might hurt him.

Yes, Trump got a big bump after the Mar-a-Lago search, but it wasn’t long-lasting. After it became clear that he indeed had classified documents and the case was, at best, more complicated than the initial narrative of an out-of-control, politically vindictive FBI suggested, Trump’s bounce faded.

If Trump is not a winner, and not fresh and interesting, and not so ideologically distinct from other Republicans like DeSantis, the case for him begins to get awfully tenuous.

These things would have been true even if Trump hadn’t announced, but if he hadn’t gotten in, people would have wondered if he’d instantly look stronger once he was actually in the race. Now, he’s answered that question for his adversaries decidedly in the negative.

Despite his efforts, Trump hasn’t even been able to sway the votes of the most right-wing members of Congress, the MAGAts, to get his Kevin the speakership. Meanwhile, Adam Kinzinger told Jake Tapper yesterday that he believes Trump “is guilty of a crime… He knew what was happening prior to January 6. He pressured Justice Department officials to ‘just say the election was stolen and leave the rest to me.’… If he is not guilty of some kind a crime, what we’ve basically said is ‘presidents are above the law and they can do everything short of a coup as long as it doesn’t succeed.’”

So Trump is suing the Pulitzer Prize Board for defamation “by honoring the New York Times and Washington Post for their reporting on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and by refusing to retract those awards. Trump better hope he gets Aileen Cannon as his judge, because anyone else would dismiss the suit in 10 minutes. The suit alleges “key assertions and premises of the Russia Collusion Hoax” crucial to both papers’ 2018 reporting were debunked by the the Mueller Report and congressional investigations. That’s certainly false. Mueller told Congress that his two-year investigation did not explore allegations of collusion, and there was not evidence “sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy” but that Trump was not “exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” while making clear his team did not have the power to indict Trump.

The Pulitzer Prize Board addressed Trump’s grievance in July by saying two independent reviews concluded “no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.”

Fox News said Trump’s case against the award committee seeks unspecified monetary damages to be “proven at trial.”