Earlier this morning, we looked at how Trump former national security advisor, Michael Flynn called for a violent overthrow of the U.S. government at the QAnon convention in Dallas over the weekend. That's the kind garbage Trump has brought to the forefront of the Republican Party-- along with freshmen members of Congress inspired by him-- like Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Mad Cawthorn (R-NC), Beth Van Duyne (R-TX), Andrew "they were just normal tourists" Clyde (R-GA), Mary Miller (R-IL), Diana Harshbarger (R-TN), Barry Moore (R-AL), Kat Cammack (R-FL), Ronny Jackson (R-TX)... some of the worst members of Congress in the country's entire history.
Before dawn this morning, Politico published a report by Meredith McGraw, David Siders and Sam Stein about the Republican politicians fleeing the GOP. They called it a Republican Party "lost generation... a host of national and statewide Republicans are either leaving office or may not choose to pursue it for fear that they can’t survive politically in the current GOP. The worry, these Republicans say, is that the party is embracing personality over policy, and that it is short sighted to align with Trump, who lost the general election and continues to alienate a large swath of the voting public with his grievances and false claims that the 2020 election was stolen."
Keep in mind when reading the report, that the Republicans who were driven away by Trump are all-- every single one of them-- toxic bags of shit... conservatives who oppose women's choice, who sell their favors to the highest bidder, who oppose worker's legitimate aspirations, who would criminalize same-sex marriage, who would deny the right to vote to non-whites. Political monstrosities like Paul Ryan and Liz Cheney... So as much as McGraw, Siders and Stein want to cry about a lost generation of Republicans... sure the Trumpists are worse but the lost generation is made up of lowlife scum as well and America is better off without them. Sure, as they wrote, "Trump has driven sitting GOP lawmakers and political aspirants into early retirements ever since he burst onto the scene." That isn't bad for America; it's good for America. The Politico trio continued that "there was hope that things would change after his election loss. Instead, his influence on the GOP appears to be as solid as ever and the impact of those early shockwaves remain visible. When asked, for instance, if he feared the 45th president was causing a talent drain from the GOP ranks, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush-- perhaps inadvertently-- offered a personal demonstration of the case. 'Thank you for checking in,' he replied. 'I am out of politics and life is good.'" The only better reply would have been that the rest of his despicable family was also out of politics... instead of sucking up to Trump as his vile, spineless son is doing now.
The 3 reporters noted that "For Trump and his allies, this is a positive development. Establishment Republican politicians, in their estimation, were out of touch with the popular sentiment of Republican voters. And the degree to which Trump helped with that reorientation has been a good thing: realigning the party with working-class voters and encouraging a new cohort of non-traditional politicians to run for office. Many in the party point to lawmakers like Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), Sen. Josh Hawley, (R-MO), Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Rep. Elise Stefanik, (R-NY) as a new era of GOP leaders. But almost all of those up-and-comers have one common trait: they have embraced Trump. And for others in the party, that fealty is a sign of a party contracting, not expanding. The fear is that, as Trump lingers on the scene, aggressively intervening in internal party disputes and openly flirting with running again in 2024, it will only get more pronounced." All of these Republicans had been elected before Trump and Scott is neither a leader nor an actual Trumpist. Maybe they were thinking of Rick Scott (R-FL).
“There is a lost generation of conservatives and I think it’s because they’re forced to tie themselves to Trump,” one Republican operative said. “There was an anti-Romney backlash, anti-Bush backlash… When you lose the presidency-- whether an incumbent or challenger-- the party distances themselves and that is absolutely not the case here."
..."If the conservative cause depends on the populist appeal of one personality, or on second-rate imitations, then we're not going anywhere,” former House Speaker Paul Ryan, who left Washington for Wisconsin two years ago, said last week on the first night of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library & Museum’s "Time for Choosing" series. “Voters looking for Republican leaders want to see independence and mettle. They will not be impressed by the sight of yes-men and flatterers flocking to Mar-a-Lago."
In a clear sign Trump was listening, the ex-president responded with a four-paragraph critique the next day. “Paul Ryan has been a curse to the Republican Party,” Trump said. Ryan didn’t respond back.
Ryan’s fear about Trump’s grip on the party is shared by top operatives who believe that few aspiring presidential candidates will choose to run if Trump ultimately does make a bid. So far, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is the only potential 2024 contender who said he wouldn’t wait around for the ex-president to make a decision first. Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley has flatly said she’d defer to her former boss before deciding on making a run.
As one close adviser coolly remarked: “They’re all so afraid [of] going first maybe? Or saying something that sounds like they’re moving on from the Trump years.”
On the congressional level, Trump’s impact on the composition of the party has been visible in obvious and subtle ways. He helped orchestrate the ouster of Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership ranks, and either directly or indirectly drove numerous lawmakers to retirement. As FiveThiryEight noted, “of the 293 Republicans who were serving in the Senate or House on Jan. 20, 2017-- the day of Trump’s inauguration-- a full 132 (45 percent) are no longer in Congress or have announced their retirement or resignation.”
“Rational, good quality candidates don't want to associate with people like Marjorie Taylor Green. So people just check out,” said Mike Madrid, a Republican strategist who was a co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project before stepping down in December.
And it’s not just potential lawmakers; it’s younger Republican voters, too. Research from Pew, as highlighted by the New York Times, showed that “from December 2015 to March 2017, nearly half of Republicans under 30 left the party...many returned, but by 2017, nearly a quarter of young conservatives had defected.”
Michael Steele, former Republican National Committee Chairman and Trump critic, said it is a “legitimate truth for the party to confront.” Republicans “run a huge risk of losing not one but maybe a couple of generations of voters who are coming of age and maturing politically.”
The trend could continue through the coming midterms. The possibility that Trump may be a drag on the party in competitive districts has worried even mainstream Republicans supportive of the former president. “What is so concerning about next year’s midterm elections for Republicans is we cannot win without the Trump supporters, and yet, if this continuing obsession with a stolen election and a fraudulent election continues, it will hurt us in our ability to attract some of those voters who abandoned Trump in 2020 and try to get them back, especially in the suburbs,” said Dick Wadhams, a former Colorado Republican Party chair and longtime party strategist.
When those GOP lawmakers not toeing the MAGA line have decided to take the plunge into electoral politics, they’ve been drubbed. Earlier this month, Michael Wood, a combat veteran and small business owner who ran on an anti-Trump platform in a special election to fill the seat of the late Rep. Ron Wright (R-TX) that he called “the first battle in this war to take back our party.”
But it wasn’t much of a battle. Wood barely registered with about three percent of the vote.
“In my darker moments, I think the only way the party is going to get the message is by losing and losing and losing,” Wood said.
Others in the party share the fear that the incentive structures Trump has put in place will lead to unelectable candidates winning nominations and losing general elections.
“We have 50 car pileup in the Pennsylvania and Ohio Senate Republican primaries with people trying to out-MAGA each other for an endorsement, and it could end up us losing the 2.5 points we need to win in the end,” warned Republican donor Dan Eberhart.
Trump allies scoff at the complaints, noting that Republicans lost winnable Senate runoff contests in Georgia while Trump wasn’t on the ballot but candidates blessed by the GOP establishment were. They argue Trump has ushered in a new wave of MAGA-leaning lawmakers and has motivated previously untapped voters, who agree with his America-first, populist message, to head to the polls.
Please recall that Señor Trumpanzee endorsed and vigorously campaigned for both losing incumbent Georgia senators, pulling out all the stops for both of them. In the process, he turned off educated and suburban voters to such an extent that both incumbents were defeated by Democrats, one Black and one Jewish, not "normal" in Georgia politics. The question is now whether or not Trump's kiss of death will defeat Republican incumbents and challengers like Senators Ron Johnson (R-WI), Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rand Paul (R-KY), and House members Beth Van Duyne (R-TX), Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Claudia Tenney (R-NY), Mike Garcia (R-CA), Victoria Spartz (R-IN), Don Bacon (R-NE), Maria Salazar (R-FL), Ashley Hinson (R-IA), Steve Chabot (R-OH), Mad Cawthorn (R-NC), Young Kim (R-CA), Tony Gonzales (R-TX), Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA), Andrew Garbarino (R-NY), Michelle Steel (R-CA), Scott Perry (R-PA), Carlos Giménez (R-FL), Ann Wagner (R-MO)...
Much to McConnell's despair, Republicans in Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona, Georgia and Alaska are almost sure to nominate fatally flawed extremists who can easily win GOP primaries and just as easily lose general elections where they have to appeal to swing voters who have grown to detest Trump and candidates tied to him.
You're making bold assumptions about americans that americans have not earned in 2 or 3 generations.
the fact that trump got a record number AFTER the worst presidency in history and more dead than all US wars combined SHOULD WyouTFU.
And democraps certainly have refused to do jack shit to earn continued/increased majorities on their own.
you have the same conditions as existed in 2010.
The only variable is how will trump insert himself into 2022 and whether his number will stay the same or get bigger. In red states, I'm betting on bigger. In other places, I don't know.
Given the constant of stupid americans and the identical conditions as before, I'll go with a repeat of history.