top of page
Search
Writer's pictureHowie Klein

Some House Republicans Are Already Speculating About Who Will Replace McCarthy As Speaker



Once the Republican circular firing squad dumps McCarthy, who would be crazy enough to want the job? True, it does come with some perks— the highest salary of anyone in Congress ($223,500) and a much higher staff allowance, as well as a huge complex of offices. Also, the use of government aircraft and a security detail… and the ability to raise— and spend— tens of millions of dollars as the party’s chief fundraiser.


McCarthy says he’ll fight to keep the job. Even if Gaetz and his cronies manage to dump him— a relatively easy thing under the new House rules— McCarthy says he’ll run again. And who would run against him? Jordain Carney wrote that some of the lunatics in the “Freedom” Caucus are already gaming it out. Dan Bishop, a North Carolina extremist with no influence outside of the “Freedom” Caucus— and who is leaving Congress to run for his state’s Attorney General— is playing “I know but you don’t” with reporters.


The likeliest candidates who might be able to muster a consensus are 2 very right wing Republicans, fascist criminal Gym Jordan (R-OH) and slightly less extreme Kevin Hern (R-OK). Carney noted that Bishop personally supports a motion to vacate against McCarthy, although he’s too much of a coward to file it himself and is waiting for Gaetz to do the dirty work.


There are other House Republicans, though, the ones who consider themselves mainstream conservatives rather than neo-Nazis, who aren’t thinking about replacing McCarthy but would rather hire a hitman to rid them of Gaetz, Bishop and the other maniacs who are making them all look bad. “House Republicans,” wrote Michael Schnell and Emily Brooks, “are growing increasingly angry with their hard-line colleagues who are blocking the chamber from advancing spending bills— a reality that is leading some [conservatives] to consider ditching Republicans and working with Democrats to avoid an end-of-the-month shutdown.



These five or 10 people, they failed us. And I’ll say that publicly,” [mainstream conservative] Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) told The Hill Wednesday morning. “They failed us, they failed the conservative cause.”
“They’re gonna push us in the minority unless we intervene,” he added at another point in the conversation.
Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA), a former Navy helicopter pilot, called the behavior from the conservatives “unacceptable and offensive.”
“Today’s actions by five members of my own party— in coordination with every Democrat— are unacceptable and offensive,” Kiggans wrote in a statement, later adding, “This type of government is as irresponsible as it is destructive.”
“Government is not a game,” she said.
Internal frustrations with the [fascists’] posture are becoming more and more acute as the calendar inches closer to the Sept. 30 government shutdown deadline with no viable plan in sight to keep Washington’s lights on.
Members of the [fascist] House Freedom Caucus and the more “pragmatic” Main Street Caucus over the weekend announced a proposal for a continuing resolution, which would fund the government through Oct. 31, impose an 8 percent cut across the board except for the departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, and enact a large part of the House GOP conference’s marquee border bill, H.R. 2.
The [fascist] plan has been viewed as the House GOP’s opening offer in eventual negotiations with the Senate and White House over averting a shutdown.
But a coalition of hard-liners quickly came out against the legislation, announcing that they would vote against it if it came to the floor, or signaling that they were leaning that way. The opposition was enough to block the legislation, prompting leadership to punt a procedural vote on the measure— a move that angered House Republicans.
The [fascist] opposition on spending bills and the stopgap bill has annoyed Republicans who represent districts President Biden won in 2020. If hard-liners force a shutdown, those moderates could be painted as members of a party that helped bring Washington to a screeching halt.
The Biden-district Republicans went after the hard-liners in a fiery press conference Tuesday immediately after the Pentagon appropriations bill procedural vote failed on the House floor.
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) said those [fascist] members are being “obstinate” on the spending issues, adding that there is a lot of frustration with the [fascists].
“We are one half of one third of this government, and we have to work together. We don’t want to be outliers. We want to be team players. But at some point, we have to step up and fight for the American people, and that’s what we intend to do,” Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR) said.
A group of military veterans also slammed the GOP rabble-rousers following the Pentagon vote.
“I’m disappointed. I am pissed off,” Rep. Mike Garcia (R-CA) said. “They just handed a win to the Chinese Communist Party as a result of this vote.”

Angry conservatives are starting to take action.
Members of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus are working on a plan to avert a shutdown but have as not yet disclosed any details. Bacon, a member of the group, said he was not prepared to talk about it Wednesday morning.
…Bacon, however, suggested Wednesday that the time has come for Republicans to ditch partisan paths forward and instead look toward an agreement that can garner support from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
“It would be one thing if you could get 218 to begin with from our group, could’ve done that last month or could’ve done it yesterday. But they’re never able to get to yes,” Bacon said.
“Me and a handful of others think it’s time for a bipartisan solution, and you can’t trust these five or 10 people to support anything,” he later added. “So the right answer has always been all along to go bipartisan because you got to do it anyway with the Senate.”

1 Comment


Guest
Sep 22, 2023

Any bipartisan agreement will always come with pain inflicted upon select demos (the poor, natch; gays, natch; women, natch... but who else? NEVER the rich or corporations).


So is it the position of this author that this is something we should embrace? Sounds like it.


Ever wonder how we got to be this fetid of a shithole in a mere 55 years? Well, there you go!


Enjoy your shithole. y'all earned it.

Like
bottom of page