top of page
Search
Writer's pictureThomas Neuburger

'Rooftop solar is the future; it's also a scam'


An AI -generated image depicting rooftop solar

By Thomas Neuburger


“All markets will do is create incentives to cheat.” —Cory Doctorow


“The problem is to get people to subordinate themselves to The Market. This is called ‘freedom.’” —Philip Mirowski


“What about the American political system requires billionaires be paid before anything good occurs?” —Yours truly


An important piece by Cory Doctorow makes several important points: about AI “reward hacking,” rooftop solar, and Wall Street. Let’s look at each, and discuss an additional point — the reason all this occurred.


The article starts:

Solar is a market for (financial) lemons Rooftop solar is the future, but it's also a scam. It didn't have to be, but America decided that the best way to roll out distributed, resilient, clean and renewable energy was to let Wall Street run the show. They turned it into a scam, and now it's in terrible trouble. which means we are in terrible trouble.

That sets the stage.


AI and Reward Hacking


If you watch the video below, you will know that AI solves problems without understanding anything about the problem but the literal problem itself.



That leads to what Bruce Schneier called “reward hacking.” Here’s Doctorow’s explanation:

For example: if you use an AI to come up with a Roomba that doesn't bang into furniture, you might tell that Roomba to avoid collisions. However, the Roomba is only designed to register collisions with its front-facing sensor. Turn the Roomba loose and it will quickly hit on the tactic of racing around the room in reverse, banging into all your furniture repeatedly, while never registering a single collision[.]

And here’s an interesting video explaining the same concept:



Maybe AI will kill us because it’s so dumb.


Soulless Corporations


But Doctorow’s piece isn’t about AI. It’s about corporations.

Both Ted Chiang and Charlie Stross have theorized that the source of these anxieties isn't AI – it's corporations. Corporations are these equilibrium-seeking complex machines that can't be programmed, only prompted. CEOs know that they don't actually run their companies, and it haunts them[.]

In the following, note the pivot in the middle, from AI to “markets.”

Stross calls corporations "Slow AI," a pernicious artificial life-form that acts like a pedantic genie, always on the hunt for ways to destroy you while still strictly following your directions. Markets are an extremely reliable way to find the most awful alignment problems – but by the time they've surfaced them, they've also destroyed the thing you were hoping to improve with your market mechanism.

Corporations are pernicious AI, according to this analysis. The have minds (or non-minds) of their own, that only seek goals. In the corporate case, the goal is to “make the most money.”


The least moral solution to mining coal

Like AI, corporations, fed by whatever is wicked in its executives, will find the least moral way to do that, because morality (“Thou shalt not kill”) is all about brakes, and corporations are all about flooring the accelerator.


Financialized Solar


The main point of the piece is solar; in particular, rooftop solar; in greater particular, financialized rooftop solar.

The problem starts with a pretty common finance puzzle: solar pays off big over its lifespan, saving the homeowner money and insulating them from price-shocks, emergency power outages, and other horrors. But solar requires a large upfront investment, which many homeowners can't afford to make. To resolve this, the finance industry extends credit to homeowners (lets them borrow money) and gets paid back out of the savings the homeowner realizes over the years to come.

But all this depends on homeowners actually wanting to spend the money. Which they didn’t, not on sufficient quantity to meet the government goal of accelerated rollout. So the government created subsidies that homeowners could get. The idea was, those subsidies would fuel the market demand for the finance industries loans.

The government created subsidies – tax credits, direct cash, and mixes thereof – in the expectation that Wall Street would see all these credits and subsidies that everyday people were entitled to and go on the hunt for them. And they did! Armies of fast-talking sales-reps fanned out across America, ringing dooorbells and sticking fliers in mailboxes, and lying like hell about how your new solar roof was gonna work out for you.

As with the subprime mortgage market, where the toxic loans were turned into investment vehicles (derivatives), so was solar indebtedness financialized. Why this is a problem, and what kind of problem it is, is best explained by pointing to this hard-titled piece in Time: “The Rooftop Solar Industry Could Be on the Verge of Collapse.”

A decade ago, someone knocking on your door to sell you solar panels would have been selling you solar panels. Now, they are probably selling you a financial product—likely a lease or a loan.  Mary Ann Jones, 83, didn’t realize this had happened to her until she received a call last year from GoodLeap, a financial technology company, saying she owed $52,564.28 for a solar panel loan that expires when she’s 106, and costs more than she originally paid for her house. […]

The Global Neoliberal Project


Doctorow correctly identifies the problem: “If governments are willing to spend billions incentivizing rooftop solar, they can simply spend billions installing rooftop solar – no Slow AI required.”


But lets go one step farther. The primary goal of neoliberalism and what we ought to call the Neoliberal Project is this: “creating a world economy where entrepreneurs could let their fortunes bloom unimpeded by negative government intervention.” Nothing gets in the way of making more money.


Philip Morowski has since said that neoliberalism evolved from that to making sure the government actively promotes the “blooming” of those fortunes.



So we can ask, paraphrasing, “if governments are willing to spend billions incentivizing (enriching) the rich, why can’t they spend the same on the actual goal?”


The answer is simple: The global Neoliberal Project, where the only goal of government is to enrich the rich, and rest is subordinate.


Or, put differently: What about the American political system requires billionaires be paid before anything good occurs? The answer: The system doesn’t exist for you. Because freedom.


If you want to know why your grandchildren could be hunter-gatherers — and their parents as well — you’ve just read the reason. Billionaires and the project that exists to sustain their wealth.


 

Cory Doctorow is fighting another war, to produce an audiobook that's not chained to Audible. If you want to help, click here.

5件のコメント


ゲスト
1月31日

Yup, that's an AI drawing, all right. Panels on a roof facing east or west are of limited use. Another SF writer of note, Peter Watt, posited a nightmare scenario: suppose you have a situation where you can have a ineffectual, complex and expensive response to maintain a status quo and save millions of lives, or you can just let the catastrophe happen, killing those millions. Now introduce the AI to the concept of Occam's Razor... -- Zepp

編集済み
いいね!
ゲスト
1月31日
返信先

Currently, AI seems to regard all media as gospel. Thus, the prevalence of nazi propoganda media and religious delusion media means that AI will never be of any benefit to people.

いいね!

barrem01
1月31日

"Like AI, corporations, fed by whatever is wicked in its executives, will find the least moral way to do that, because morality (“Thou shalt not kill”) is all about brakes, and corporations are all about flooring the accelerator." This is why you can't have capitalism without regulation. Capitalism is a powerful engine, but like a team of wild horses, without regulations to steer it, it's just as likely to pull society over a cliff as it is to take us where we want to go. The alternative to regulation is high taxation to fund a big government to repair the damage to society capitalism does - if you don't clean up your own mess, you'll have to pay someone else to d…

いいね!
ゲスト
1月31日
返信先

yes. coupla things:

in your team of horses analogy, the horses are the nazis. They'll just go where they want to go, driven by food and/or sex. The "steering" mechanism would be the democrap party and, by extension, their voters. THAT is what is totally missing in this shithole. The Democraps are steering toward max profit velocities, just as their investors direct them; and voters refuse to do anything different... just keep affirming the money's primacy.

The "engaged, powerful (and altruistic) government" is what has been totally missing since 1968. And no voters exist in this shithole will ever vote for one ever again.


Thus, the team of horses will just go where they will go -- eventually to the…

いいね!

ゲスト
1月30日

A little disjointed perhaps, but a really important piece. Sadly, it isn't "Slow AI" in play. It's mass REVERSE AI.


“If governments are willing to spend billions incentivizing rooftop solar, they can simply spend billions installing rooftop solar – no Slow AI required.”


DUH! But nobody has elected such a government, ON PURPOSE, since the '60s. Again... DUH!!!


'But lets go one step farther. The primary goal of neoliberalism and what we ought to call the Neoliberal Project is this: “creating a world economy where entrepreneurs could let their fortunes bloom unimpeded by negative government intervention.” Nothing gets in the way of making more money.'


DUH!!! But, and again, nobody has voted AGAINST the global "neoliberal project" since the '60s…


いいね!
bottom of page