Before he was subsumed into MAGA-world, Mike Pence was a tawdry right-wing extremist in the House who was elected governor of beet red Indiana and was destined for the ignominy of one term status. Few, other than homophobic religionists, could stand the guy. His career in politics was facing a dead end, when Trump felt impelled to scoop him up as a sop to the evangelical wing of the GOP that Trump couldn't imagine relating to himself. Now that wing of the party would be glad to nail Mike Pence to a cross in return for Trump letting them lick his ass.
This morning The Hill published an OpEd on Pence by Richard Weisberg, a professor of constitutional law at Yeshiva University, a distinguished visiting professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh, a recipient of the France's Legion of Honor from Sarkozy, and an appointee to a very minor position by Obama. I couldn't figure out if what he wrote was parody or not but after reading it and re-reading it, I came to the conclusion that Professor Weisberg has spent too much of time with his head buried in scholarly tomes to have much to say that has any relevance to the real world.
Weisberg's ill-conceived essay includes absurd zingers like "Pence is a good man" and "The good, sane, former Indiana governor in Pence" and "If Benjamin Franklin could vote for the man of the year, it would be for Pence." Maybe this passes for wisdom at Yesgiva University Law School... I'm sure it does at the Liberty University Law School. In Yeshiva's defense, last spring they retired him from teaching and gave him emeritus status.
Anyway, it wasn't parody and he wrote that Mike Pence would make a good president (of the United States). Imagine enrolling in a school where he's the star professor! Weisberg suggests that Pence may "do the right thing early in 2022 by announcing his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election, emphasizing that his party needs to get rid of Trump and campaigning immediately to restore Republicans to sanity." And why exactly is Pence fit for that role? Maybe Weisberg had never heard of him until he became the most mediocre vice president in contemporary history.
We haven’t heard much from Pence since the Capitol riots. He singlehandedly kept the republic that day (and night). If Benjamin Franklin could vote for the man of the year, it would be for Pence. The calm visage of the then-vice president fulfilling his ministerial duty to count electoral votes that day contrasted vividly with the adoring unctuousness of his face over the prior four years as he gazed at Trump with reverence.
On Jan. 6, the good Christian in Pence finally dovetailed with the good servant of the Constitution who had sworn to defend against enemies, domestic or foreign. His candidacy would mobilize many faithful Christians who, remarkably, stand by Trump against their better judgment. They want a believer who knows the Bible right-side-up. They would vote for Pence in 2024.
The good, sane, former Indiana governor in Pence would also reemerge in his campaign, reminding people that government can be the answer, not the problem. His “flyover state” credentials would situate him perfectly to garner not only the Red states but (depending on who runs for the Democrats) a number of midwestern blue and purple states as well.
As Pence ponders his future, he might anticipate with relish sharing the debate stage with Trump. No more cozying up to craziness: instead, he can be an articulate politician calling out the sheer ignorance of the bully standing at the lectern next to his. People in both parties have been yearning for such simple courage. But it would be easier than when he ignored death threats at the Capitol, as he dutifully pronounced Joe Biden president of the United States.
This coming Jan. 6 is a key date for Mike Pence. Who better to declare the end of the Trump era on that anniversary? He can appear during the anniversary of the riots at a press conference in Indiana’s farm country, emboldened and ready to ward off the inevitable nonsense from the Trump acolytes. Like Cary Grant in North by Northwest, he can hide in the cornfields as they take shots at him, then emerge to fend off their evil. He will gain instant support from some in his party and a gradual majority as time goes on and the bluster of his former boss grows as tiresome as it is rotten.
Pence may be thinking along these lines right now. He has the political skills, the rhetorical ability and the track record to pull off a victory at the Republican convention in 2024. He wants his grandchildren to think well of him. He seeks forgiveness from the deity he worships. Everything important to him points in this direction.
Arise, Mike Pence! Make it your resolution to impede a dastardly and brutish leader. Reemerge to restore sanity to your party and legitimacy to your legacy. You will have the good wishes of all those who may vote against you eventually in November 2024 and the inevitable support of those in your party who are needed to nominate you that prior summer.
Pence is a good man-- Jan. 6 proved that, at least in Constitutional terms. May his conscience, his courage, his constituents or even a simple New Year’s resolution cause him to honor that date by announcing his intention to represent his party at the top of its ticket in the next presidential election.
I guess this is taking the idea of the lesser of two evils to the extreme of extremes.
Only in the delusions of the most insane fool is this pos a "good man".
He's a messianic narcissist who has one and only one redeeming feature: he figured out the untennable position he was in (finally!) and chose the best of his terrible possible paths forward.
IOW, the republic was lucky... one last time.
At some point during the trump reich's first trial term, he surely realized that he had his head all the way up the ass of his antichrist. Perhaps it wasn't until 1-6. Perhaps it was before and he could not decide on HIS best path forward... keeping in mind his ambition to win an election in order to impose his christian taliban caliphate.
But in…