By Thomas Neuburger
An enemy of the state is a person accused of political crimes such as treason. In designating persons as enemies of the state, the government can realize the political repression of political opponents, such as dissidents. A government can justify political repression as protecting the national security of the country and the nation. —Wikipedia
It's time to talk about Julian Assange, again. A decision on his extradition from the torture of his UK imprisonment to the torture of a U.S. imprisonment — where I believe he will be killed — could come any day.
From a legal standpoint, his crimes are none.
Misconception: Julian Assange is a “traitor” who should be brought to trial in the United States. Correction: Assange is not an American citizen, he has never lived in the US, and he does not have any significant ties to the US. He is an Australian citizen who was living and working in London when the US government opened its case against him. The charges against him are connected to WikiLeaks’ publication of materials in the public interest. Assange’s extradition would set a dangerous precedent that could put other publishers and journalists around the world at risk, regardless of citizenship. Worryingly, the US government has also stated that First Amendment protections will not apply to Assange as a non-citizen.
Misconception: Julian Assange is a whistleblower who leaked classified information. Correction: Assange played a different role to that of whistleblower; he did not leak classified information himself, but he published information that was leaked to him. The leaker, former Army analyst Chelsea Manning, already served more than seven years in prison before President Obama commuted her 35-year sentence, stating it was “very disproportionate relative to what other leakers have received”. If extradited to the US, Assange would be the first publisher tried under the Espionage Act, which lacks a public interest defence, meaning anyone accused in this way cannot sufficiently defend themselves. He faces the possibility of a staggering 175-year prison sentence.
But from the standpoint of the State, Assange is an enemy. The most notable of these crimes are listed below. (For others, like the diplomatic cables leaks, see this excellent piece by Lee Fang.)
1. Many, even self-identified liberals, hate him for publishing leaked information about Hillary Clinton and the DNC during the 2016 election. Note "Russian Wikileaks" below.
Clinton said she was confident that she was on track to winning the election until two things reversed her momentum: the release of campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails, which were allegedly stolen by Russian hackers, and Comey’s Oct. 28 letter to Congress that he had reopened the bureau’s investigation into her use of a private email server. “I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off
This is a widely held belief, and in my view it's baseless, since no evidence, as opposed to assertions, for its truth have been presented anywhere.
2. Those who run the State hate him for exposing how the U.S. makes war.
Watch the Wikileaks-made film, Collateral Murder, embedded at the top. (If the embed won't play, click here.)
It's brutal to watch, but I challenge you to do it anyway. It shows not just murder, but a special kind of murder -- murder from the safety of the air, murder by men with heavy machine guns slowly circling their targets in helicopters like hunters with shotguns who walk the edges of a trout pond, shooting at will, waiting, walking, then shooting again, till all the fish are dead.
The film also shows war crimes, apparently par for the course, that implicate the entire structure of the U.S. military, as everyone involved was acting under orders, seeking permission to fire, waiting, then getting it before once more blasting away. The publication of this video, plus all the Wikileaks publications that followed, comprise the whole reason everyone in the U.S. who matters, everyone with power, wants Julian Assange dead.
Everyone with power also want him hated. Generating that hate is the process we're watching today.
"Everyone" in this case includes every major newspaper that published and received awards for publishing Wikileaks material; all major U.S. televised media outlets; and all "respectable" U.S. politicians -- including, of course, Hillary Clinton, who was rumored (though unverifiably) to have said, "Can't we just drone this guy?"
It was revealed by Michael Isikoff that the CIA and the Trump administration contemplated his murder:
Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.” The conversations were part of an unprecedented CIA campaign directed against WikiLeaks and its founder. The agency’s multipronged plans also included extensive spying on WikiLeaks associates, sowing discord among the group’s members, and stealing their electronic devices.
So do please watch the film. The footage shows not only murder, but bloodlust and conscienceless brutality, so much of it in fact that this became one of the main reasons Chelsea Manning leaked it in the first place. As she said at her court-martial:
"The most alarming aspect of the video for me, was the seemingly delight of bloodlust they [the pilots] appeared to have. They dehumanized the individuals they were engaging with, and seemed to not value human life in referring to them as 'dead bastards,' and congratulating each other on the ability to kill in large numbers."
This is done in our name, to "keep us safe." This continues to be done every day that we and our allies are at "war" in the Middle East.
Bodies pile on bodies as this continues. The least we can do, literally the least, is to witness and acknowledge their deaths. And prevent the murder of Julian Assange for exposing these murderers for who they are.
Since WWII, "we" have had millions killed "in our names" all over the world. We've had democratic governments overthrown and had murderous dictators installed with the only requirement being that they are slavish to american corporate interests.
Nobody, least of all any media in this shithole, will remember PNAC, but Iraq was destroyed along with a million lives, give or take, so that america could exploit their oil. It didn't work out... but that was the motivation.
Thus, most of those millions of killings are not to keep us/US safe, it is to keep the world's resources safe for our corporate titans to exploit and profit from.
Excellent.
I would never say they are doing this shit to "keep us safe". They are doing this to keep their jobs safe... from the exposure of atrocities they regularly commit... for fun and profit.
30 years ago I would have attributed the overt bloodlust and glee that those who committed the war crimes in the video to simply the result of the military doing what all militaries do... dehumanizing the "others" to the level of subhuman. But this shithole actually BREEDS sociopaths... has since the '60s. The military really does not have to do anything to make their volunteers believe the "enemy" is subhuman. We've been 'selecting' for that trait for 3 generations. Prolly why we have 80 mil…
There has been so much brutality promoted by the USA in other parts of the world. Central and South America come to mind, let alone the Middle East. Pinochet in Chile is a prime example. We interfere in other countries elections, particularly when their democracies want to own their own food and metals and oil rather than have American corporations or other bad players profit from their riches. Our country would become far better morally and politically if we faced our history, exposed our faults and chose to learn and improve from them. But no - politicians much prefer ignorance and push the theme that we are the ultimate version of high morality that never errs. How's that playing …