top of page
Search
Writer's pictureHowie Klein

After Clinton's Decision To Turn The Dems Towards Wall St., Is Anyone In Congress Still Pro-Labor



Mayo Pete’s McKinsey training kicked right in as he’ was tasked with keeping the railroad unions from striking. He’s urging the Senate to work in a bipartisan fashion to screw the workers, insisting, on Fox News, that forcing the workers to accept a contact they voted down is the “best way forward,” even if it isn’t for the workers. Isn’t that called union-busting? Or only when Republicans do it? “Where I hope to see it going is bipartisan cooperation to move this quickly through Congress and get it to the president's desk. Look, I don't care what your politics are, America can't have a rail shutdown. There is no substitute for a well-functioning rail system in the country.” There is a substitute, a temporary one… but it isn’t what McKinsey robots are ever taught about… Justice.


Biden and the congressional Democratic establishment came up with a rather transparent way to keep the apparent onus of screwing the workers off themselves— the second bill— glaringly not part of the “must pass” bill, that tossed the workers a few more sick days. Every House Democrat and 3 Republicans voted for it. And that’s the last you’ll ever hear of that inconvenience. It was just some kabuki theater so House Dems can feign solidarity with rail workers. If they really wanted to demonstrate support—actual support— they would have simply said they wouldn’t support the must pass bill without the sick leave provisions included, the way Rashida Tlaib, Mary Peltola, Judy Chu, Mark DeSaulnier and a few others did.


Jake Sherman, writing for Punchbowl this morning made Biden’s mess into a test for progressives, “a public test of their mettle. The question for progressives is this— do they fight or do they fold? Progressive lawmakers are furious that the deal the White House cut with railroad companies” gives the workers just one measly day of sick leave.


There are a few Senate Republicans siding with the progressives, especially senators in states where the railroads are a lifeline, like Wyoming and North Dakota. And then you’ve got pretend populists like Marco Rubio and Josh Hawley making noises about supporting workers. “So now, just a week before a potentially devastating rail strike begins,” wrote Sherman, “progressive senators will have to decide whether to try to vote down the agreement because of what they consider a paltry amount of paid leave. Or will they ratify a deal they claim puts cash-rich railroad corporations ahead of workers? As of now, not a single progressive we spoke to seems committed to the fight. Sanders called it ‘absurd’ that railroads ‘making record breaking profits’ cannot give workers ‘doing dangerous jobs’ paid leave. Sanders only allowed that the Senate ‘will have [a] vote’ on increasing the paid leave to seven days. When asked if he was willing to kill the Biden agreement to force the issue, he said he did not want to speculate. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), a staunch union ally, wouldn’t even entertain the idea that Democrats would have to fight. Read this quote with all the sarcasm intended:


“Republicans … are now the working class party, man. Marco Rubio’s the populist. They’re there, man. They want to help workers. They’re like the Trotskyite Party, man.”


Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) has signaled openness to more paid leave for workers, saying he would vote for ‘what the workers support.’ Also: Several Senate Republicans have said they would vote for the Biden-cut deal… How does this story end? Some Senate Republicans have suggested Congress should push off the Dec. 8 strike deadline so the unions and management can find a deal. But at this point, it seems likely that progressive Senate Democrats will have to swallow a rail deal that includes just one day of paid leave. Because Biden asked them to do so.”


Reporting this morning from The Hill:

  • McConnell told reporters that he’s willing to fast-track the House-passed measure.

  • Some Republican senators who will do anything to harm Biden politically are opposing helping the Democrats solve the problem

  • Bernie says he’ll hold up the bill unless he gets a roll call vote on giving workers seven guaranteed sick days. Earlier, he noted that “If the rail industry can afford to spend $25.5 billion this year to buy back its own stock and hand out huge dividends to its wealthy shareholders, please do not tell me it cannot afford to guarantee paid sick days to its workers and provide them with a decent quality of life.”

  • Unions had asked for 15 days of sick leave but the progressives cut that in half for them as an opening negotiating point with the railroads and conservatives.

When Bernie's bill came up this afternoon it got 52 votes but needed 60. So it failed. Manchin voted against it (the only Democrat to do so). 6 Republicans voted for it-- Mike Braun (IN), Ted Cruz (TX), Lindsey Graham (SC), Josh Hawley (MO), John Kennedy (LA) and Marco Rubio (FL). The rail tycoons lobbied the GOP (and Manchin) furiously to vote no. Manchin says Biden didn't lobby for the Bernie bill. Bernie joked to Cruz after he voted for the bill: "I always knew you were a socialist."


And then Biden's union-busting bill came up for a vote and it passed 80-15, with Rand Paul voting "present." Worker-supporting senators who voted against the bill included Bernie, of course, as well as Jeff Merkley (OR) and Elizabeth Warren (MA). This should now trigger a general strike across the country... but it won't.



310 views

4 Comments


Allen Sommerby
Allen Sommerby
Dec 02, 2022

totally shocked by this /s


DEM's pushing working class ppl onto the MAGA train 💀

Like

ptoomey
Dec 02, 2022

So our great labor-loving president, instead of trying to use his self-touted skills at "bipartisanship" to bring GOP senators over, has his SecTrans trying to sell this POS. I recall when the last Dem president promised to "put on a pair of comfortable shoes" and walk on picket lines.


Labor has been the party's battered spouse since WJC rammed NAFTA through in 1993. This is one of the more obvious examples of that fact.

Like
dcrapguy
dcrapguy
Dec 02, 2022
Replying to

wasn't just slick willie. it was the entire party. and they (both slick willie and party) followed that up with GLBA and CFMA and deregs that catalyzed the crash of 2008. Plenty there to consider that pos one of our very worst presidents... but there was more.

Like

dcrapguy
dcrapguy
Dec 01, 2022

the title is a canard. as long as the party is servile to wall street, it really doesn't matter if any one individual is... less so. especially when they put party ahead of every other interest, as AOC and Bernie have.


And the party does everything it can, legal and not, to prevent as many who are not from ever getting elected. DWT covers the "graysoning" of the better candidates pretty well, even if it does put the party ahead of every other interest in the end.


voters may still believe in stated motives for some candidate or another... like AOC and Bernie. But when they kowtow to the wishes and deeds of the PARTY (and, by extension, the mone…


Like
bottom of page